Alternative Medicine Figures Dr. Biswarup Chaudhary and Acharya Manish Under Scrutiny for Unproven Cancer Cure Claims

Dr. Biswarup Chaudhary and Acharya Manish, (the featured image is from the internet and used for representation only) two prominent figures in India’s alternative medicine scene, Dr. Biswarup Chaudhary and Acharya Manish, are facing scrutiny over their claims of curing cancer through unorthodox methods. While both have garnered attention for their promises of natural remedies, medical experts warn that their approaches lack scientific validation and may pose risks to patients. A closer examination reveals a troubling absence of peer-reviewed research and independent verification, raising concerns about the legitimacy of their cancer treatment claims.

Dr. Biswarup Chaudhary: Controversial Claims and Questionable Credentials

Dr. Biswarup Chaudhary, also known as Biswaroop Roy Chowdhury, has built a following by promoting the D.I.P. (Diabetes in Pregnancy) diet, which he claims can cure a range of diseases, including cancer. His website, [biswaroop.com](https://biswaroop.com/), touts the diet as “clinically proven” to reverse conditions like cancer, with millions of adopters worldwide. However, investigations into his background and methods paint a different picture.

According to [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biswaroop_Roy_Chowdhury), Chaudhary lacks formal medical training, holding only an honorary PhD in “diabetes science” from a non-accredited university in Zambia, described as an “online scam.” He is also accused of running World Records University, a dubious institution alleged to sell fraudulent PhDs. The [BBC](https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-56845610) has labeled him a “Covid quack” for spreading misinformation during the pandemic, including false claims about curing COVID-19, diabetes, and AIDS through diet alone.

Chaudhary’s cancer-specific claims are equally bold. His self-published book, *Cure For Blood Disorders: Thalassemia & Cancer*, available on [Amazon.in](https://www.amazon.in/Cure-Blood-Disorders-Thalassemia-Cancer/dp/9355997019), promises a permanent cure for cancer and cites testimonials, such as helping 40 thalassemia patients with “Living Water Therapy.” However, these claims are unsupported by peer-reviewed research. The Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) has previously found his diabetes cure claims to be misleading, in violation of the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act, 1954.

Acharya Manish: Ayurvedic Promises Without Scientific Backing

Acharya Manish, an Ayurveda and naturopathy expert, is the founder of HIIMS (Hospital & Institute of Integrated Medical Sciences) and promotes a multidisciplinary approach to treating cancer through Ayurveda, Allopathy, Unani, Naturopathy, and Homeopathy. His website, [acharyamanish.com](https://acharyamanish.com/), and related platforms like [hiims.in](https://hiims.in/), feature success stories of patients allegedly cured of cancer and other serious conditions.

However, these claims are largely anecdotal and lack the scientific rigor required to validate such treatments. Articles on sites like [buzzingchandigarh.com](https://www.buzzingchandigarh.com/2023/12/renowned-ayurveda-proponent-acharya.html) highlight HIIMS’s success stories, but they are promotional in nature and do not provide clinical trial data or independent verification. Manish’s webinars, such as those advertised on [hiims.in](https://hiims.in/blog/acharya-manish-ji-free-live-webinar-on-ayurvedic-cancer-treatment/), focus on natural methods but fail to offer concrete evidence of efficacy.

His approach, which includes dietary changes, herbal remedies, and detoxification practices like Panchakarma, is presented as a holistic alternative to conventional cancer treatments. Yet, searches for peer-reviewed studies or independent reviews on platforms like PubMed yield no results supporting his cancer cure claims. Reviews of his clinics on [Practo](https://www.practo.com/thane/clinic/acharya-manish-ji-ayurveda-centre-thane-west) are positive for general Ayurvedic care but do not mention cancer treatment outcomes, further underscoring the lack of credible evidence.

A Comparative Look: Methods, Controversies, and Public Perception

While both Chaudhary and Manish operate in the alternative medicine space, their methods and public profiles differ significantly:

Credentials: Chaudhary’s lack of formal medical training and questionable PhD have drawn widespread criticism, while Manish is recognized as an Ayurveda expert but lacks a specified medical degree.
Methods: Chaudhary relies heavily on his D.I.P. diet, claiming it can cure cancer through nutrition alone. Manish promotes a multidisciplinary approach rooted in Ayurveda and other traditional systems.
Scientific Evidence: Neither has produced peer-reviewed studies to back their cancer cure claims. Chaudhary’s assertions have been discredited by organizations like the ASCI and the BBC, while Manish’s claims remain unverified beyond promotional materials.
Controversy: Chaudhary faces significant backlash, with accusations of misinformation and quackery, including bans on his social media accounts. Manish, while less controversial, still operates without independent validation of his cancer treatments.
Public Presence: Chaudhary leverages YouTube, books, and websites to spread his message, while Manish focuses on webinars, clinics, and his HIIMS hospitals.

The Risks of Unproven Cancer Treatments

The absence of scientific evidence for both Chaudhary and Manish’s cancer treatments raises serious concerns. Cancer is a complex disease requiring evidence-based interventions, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, which are supported by decades of research and clinical trials. Relying on unproven methods can delay or replace life-saving treatments, potentially worsening patient outcomes.

Testimonials, such as those featured on Chaudhary’s website or in Manish’s promotional blogs, are not a substitute for rigorous scientific validation. Articles like one on [Life Positive](https://www.lifepositive.com/takebackyourpower/) mention general health improvements from Chaudhary’s diet but do not address cancer specifically. Similarly, Manish’s blog posts, such as those on [acharyamanish.com/blogs](https://acharyamanish.com/blogs), share survivor stories without medical documentation or independent review.

Caution Urged Amid Lack of Evidence

The claims made by Dr. Biswarup Chaudhary and Acharya Manish regarding cancer cures lack the scientific foundation necessary to be considered legitimate treatments. Chaudhary’s history of misinformation and discredited credentials, combined with Manish’s reliance on unverified promotional materials, suggest that their approaches are not grounded in evidence-based medicine.

Medical experts emphasize the importance of consulting certified oncologists and relying on treatments backed by peer-reviewed research. Patients are urged to exercise caution when considering alternative therapies, particularly for serious conditions like cancer, where unproven methods can pose significant risks. As regulatory bodies like the ASCI continue to monitor misleading health claims, the public is reminded that extraordinary medical promises require extraordinary evidence—something neither Chaudhary nor Manish has provided.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Quote of the week

“Every sunset is an opportunity to reset. Every sunrise begins with new eyes.”

~ Richie Norton